GAPS in database (AI boards) when translating database after upgrade from MP200 to AC410
We have experienced GAPS in the database for AI instances (LF 6) after translating database in a controller that is upgraded from MP200 to AC410. The database was dumped from the MP200 and translated to the AC410 (DUDBS and TRDBS). There was a requirement to have the sw 1 to 1, thus only required changes to the database where performed.
There are 9 AI boards in the controller.
AI 1 - 5 are DSAI 130
AI 6 is DSAI 145
AI7 is DSAI 155
AI8 - AI9 are DSAI 130.
Instances on AI1 - AI5 starts from LF1 - LF80
Then there is a jump in the database when instances on AI6 starts:
Instances on AI6 starts from LF141 - 171
Then there is a new jump when AI7 start.
Instances on AI7 starts from LF190 - 203Then AI8 and AI9 continues from LF81 - LF112 In the database there are AIC instances from LF126 - LF140 and from LF185 - LF189. Usually the rule is that GAPS in the databse should be avoided, thus we are discussing with the customer if the GAPS should be "filled" with spare AIC´s. In connection to this I have two questions: 1. Are areas in the LF reserved for specific types of boards as the DSAI start from LF141 (AI6) and LF190 (AI7) or is this due to the AIC´s occupying space from LF126 - LF140 and LF185 - LF189? 2. Will the GAPS cause problems to the AC410 and should be "filled" with spare AIC´s? All relevant comments are appreciated. Thanks
Insert the URL that your highlighted text will link to.
Copy the video's "embed" tag into Embedded Video below.